News
Pro-XRP Lawyer Criticizes SEC Chairman Gensler’s Crypto Understanding, Here’s Everything
Professional XRP lawyer Bill Morgan has publicly criticized SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s recent actions in the cryptocurrency space, particularly highlighting Gensler’s perceived lack of understanding of the industry. This criticism stems from observations made by an MIT professor who stated that Gensler had limited knowledge of cryptocurrencies by joining @joi at MIT. Despite Gensler’s role in teaching a course on Digital Assets, his understanding of the subject appears questionable.
Further examination of Gensler’s errors and inaccuracies
XRP professional lawyer Bill Morgan has stepped up his criticism of Gary Gensler recent missteps in the cryptocurrency sphere, particularly focusing on Gensler’s inadequate understanding of the field. He emphasized Gensler’s comments as SEC chairman, characterizing them as indicative of his terrible understanding of cryptography. Boring Sleuth, a prominent critic, echoed these sentiments, highlighting Gensler’s failure to recognize the significant role played by the Chinese Communist Party-backed company Wanxiang in the early days of Ethereum.
During a recent talk at MIT, Gensler knowingly misled his students by teaching a false story about the Ethereum ICO. He claimed that Ethereum’s funding originated primarily from Canadian venture capital firms, omitting crucial information about Wanxiang’s involvement. Contrary to Gary Gensler’s narrative, Wanxiang, a company linked to the Chinese Communist Party, was Ethereum the first and largest backer, providing substantial funding to the Ethereum Foundation and participating in over 500 ICOs. This deliberate omission raised serious questions about Gensler’s credibility and his commitment to providing accurate information to his students and the public.
The discovery that Gary Gensler misrepresented Ethereum’s funding sources has sparked widespread concerns in the crypto community. Questions have arisen about Gensler’s motives and the accuracy of his teachings on topics related to cryptocurrency. Additionally, critics have pointed out inconsistencies in Gensler’s narrative, such as his assertion that Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, needed to raise funds and sought capital from Canadian VCs before the ICO. However, evidence suggests that Buterin’s wallets were created and funded by Wanxiang Blockchain Labs/Fenbushi Capital, indicating a direct connection to the Chinese Communist Party rather than Canadian venture capital firms.
These findings led to a deeper examination of Gensler’s understanding of cryptocurrencies and his suitability as SEC chairman. The fact that he propagated false information in an academic setting raises serious doubts about his competence to regulate the rapidly evolving crypto industry. As calls for transparency and accountability grow louder, Gensler faces increasing pressure to address these concerns and provide accurate information to the public and policymakers.
Read too: Pendle token theft outbreaks, $5.62 million lost in recent license phishing
Potential SEC Rejection of Ethereum ETFs and Regulatory Implications
James Seyffart, a prominent Bloomberg analyst, recently highlighted the growing likelihood that the SEC will reject Ethereum ETF, suggesting that the SEC is considering classifying Ethereum as a security. This potential classification could significantly impact the approval process for Ethereum-based financial products. While not a definitive result, the mere consideration of such a rating by the SEC is noteworthy and indicates greater regulatory scrutiny.
This development marks one of the first times such a possibility has been publicly mentioned in SEC filings, highlighting the evolving regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies. Different Bitcoin ETFs, which has not faced similar concerns from the SEC, the classification of Ethereum as a commodity by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) further complicates the regulatory environment. In response to these developments, Ethereum developer Consensys took legal action against the SEC, urging the agency not to classify ETH as a security. This lawsuit highlights the significant risks involved and the diverse perspectives within the crypto industry regarding the regulatory classification of Ethereum.
Read too: Solana price soars as experts suggest $200 as next target for SOL