News
Ripple CLO Lambasts Gary Gensler as SEC Battle Intensifies
The legal conflict between Ripple and the SEC has taken a violent turn, with Ripple Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty harshly criticizing SEC Chairman Gary Gensler. Meanwhile, Alderoty’s recent targeting of the SEC chairman underscores the escalation of tensions as the case progresses, highlighting the high risks involved for both Ripple and the broader cryptocurrency industry. Furthermore, it also reflects how cryptography has emerged as an important aspect of the US presidential elections.
Ripple CLO Targets SEC Chairman Gensler
Stuart Alderoty, CLO of Ripple, recently expressed strong criticism of the SEC chairman Gary Gensler in X. In his post, he accused Gensler of overstepping his authority and becoming a political liability. Precisely, he stated:
“Gensler exaggerated. He thought cryptography was an easy target. He loved being the guy everyone loved to hate. He thought he was above congressional oversight. It’s all over. He is now a struggling political liability,”
Notably, the comment reflects growing frustrations within the cryptocurrency community. Meanwhile, this comment was a response to another post highlighting the unusual political spotlight on the SEC.
The user highlighted that it is unprecedented for a presidential candidate to mention the name of the SEC chairman or for a sitting president to threaten to veto Legislation related to the SEC. This political dimension adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal battle.
Read too: Bitcoin Whales Raise $636 Million in a Single Day, What’s Next for BTC Price?
Uniswap Battle Sparks Discussions
The influence of the Ripple case extends beyond its immediate parties. For context, Uniswap made reference to the Ripple case in its legal dispute with the SEC, particularly regarding the nature of airdrops.
Meanwhile, pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan noted: “Uniswap felt the need to argue that airdrops are not investment contracts. The SEC must have referred to airdrops in the Wells warning.” Morgan highlighted the SEC’s inconsistent positions, stating: “It makes no sense that some donated tokens are not inherently securities and other sold tokens are inherently securities. It must be the circumstances of the sale.
This shared legal fight highlights the broader implications of the Ripple case. In other words, the SEC’s approach to regulating digital assets is under intense scrutiny, with key players in the crypto space closely monitoring the results.
Meanwhile, the legal battle has intensified with the SEC’s recent order against Ripple’s motion to seal and redact certain information. On May 21, the SEC argued that Ripple’s request to hide financial and securities sales information from the public was illegal.
In the latest order, the regulator claimed that the details Curling seeks to write, such as financial numbers, sales data and discounts for institutional investors, are crucial to the court’s decision-making process. Furthermore, the SEC emphasized that this information is vital to understanding the penalties and resolutions in the case.
They argued that Ripple failed to demonstrate how making this information public would cause substantial harm. Additionally, the SEC noted that some of the information Ripple wants to hide is already publicly available or out of date.
Read too: Hong Kong Ether ETFs See Highest Daily Flow Since Launch